Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:46:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:46:39 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:55825 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:46:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:55:17 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "David S. Miller" Cc: andrea@suse.de, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: 2.4 delayed acks don't work, fixed Message-ID: <20030319015517.GA15150@wotan.suse.de> References: <20030318221906.GA30541@dualathlon.random> <200303182235.BAA05440@sex.inr.ac.ru> <20030319002409.GI30541@dualathlon.random> <20030318.163701.56035556.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030318.163701.56035556.davem@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 751 Lines: 18 > This streamer application should buffer at the sending side, in order > to keep the window full. Introducing artificial delays on the sending > side of a unidirectional TCP transfer is really bad for performance > and I can assure you that more than just "weird delayed ACK" behavior > will result. The broken tail append patch I did some time ago was supposed to address that (better merging of writes on the sender side even for non SG NICs). Perhaps it should be rechecked. It may fix this. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/