Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754257AbcDAVkh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:40:37 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:36707 "EHLO
	mail-pf0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752459AbcDAVkf (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:40:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: call cpufreq hook in additional paths
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
References: <1458858367-2831-1-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org>
 <20160331075951.GG3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160331091426.GE11035@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56FEEAD0.2040108@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:40:32 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160331091426.GE11035@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1079
Lines: 26

On 03/31/2016 02:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:59:51AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> > >  - passing an argument into attach_entity_load_avg() to indicate                                                 
>>> > >    whether calling the cpufreq hook is necessary
>>> > > 
>>> > > Both of these are ugly in their own way but would avoid a runtime
>>> > > cost. Opinions welcome.
>> > 
>> > Lemme see what this would look like while I throw the below into the bit
>> > bucket.
> OK, so the below looks a lot more sane; and has the surprising benefit
> of actually shrinking the text size..
> 
>   43675    1226      24   44925    af7d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.base
>   43723    1226      24   44973    afad defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.patch
>   43595    1226      24   44845    af2d defconfig-build/kernel/sched/fair.o.patch+
> 
> ---
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c

Cool, thanks. Shall I fold this into this patch and resend the series of
3? Or would you prefer to add this change separately?

thanks,
Steve