Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753148AbcDBLXz (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:23:55 -0400
Received: from ud10.udmedia.de ([194.117.254.50]:50180 "EHLO
	mail.ud10.udmedia.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752569AbcDBLXy (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:23:54 -0400
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:23:51 +0200
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: "perf: interrupt took too long" messages even with
 perf_cpu_time_max_percent==0
Message-ID: <20160402112351.GC305@x4>
References: <20160402093239.GA305@x4>
 <20160402110017.GP3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160402111726.GB305@x4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160402111726.GB305@x4>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 327
Lines: 11

On 2016.04.02 at 13:17 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > Does the below help?
> 
> Thanks. I will test it later. But 91a612eea9a3 makes the assumption that only
> sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent==100 disables the feature also in
> kernel/events/core.c.

Please ignore the last sentence. It doesn't make sense.

-- 
Markus