Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752757AbcDBSUB (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:20:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:38134 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282AbcDBSUA (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:20:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC patch 4/7] futex: Add support for attached futexes To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML References: <20160402095108.894519835@linutronix.de> <20160402110035.753145539@linutronix.de> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Darren Hart , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Michael Kerrisk , Davidlohr Bueso , Chris Mason , "Carlos O'Donell" , Torvald Riegel , Eric Dumazet From: Andy Lutomirski Message-ID: <57000D4B.5000406@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:19:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160402110035.753145539@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 172 Lines: 6 On 04/02/2016 04:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [omitted due to some Thunderbird bug, sigh] What happens if you mix attached an non-attached ops on the same futex? --Andy