Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:27:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:27:38 -0500 Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net ([206.13.28.240]:23718 "EHLO mta6.snfc21.pbi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:27:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 08:29:48 -0800 From: Dan Kegel Subject: Re: Linus's poll variation To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lyle Coder Reply-to: dank@alumni.caltech.edu Message-id: <3A0044FC.DEE2C02@alumni.caltech.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Lyle asked: > Is someone working on Linus's poll variation discussed in this list a week ago? I think the interface still needs some discussion. The interface Linus proposed is IMHO oriented towards ease of kernel implementation, and doesn't appear to be easy to use for all applications. cf. recent posts by John Gardiner Myers e.g. http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2000week44/0966.html http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2000week45/0212.html IMHO kqueue()/kevent() is closer to what the apps want. Mike Jagdis, however, has done some work on speeding up the existing poll() system call, and has an eye on implementing the /dev/poll interface. See http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2000week45/0266.html - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/