Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754176AbcDDGHW (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 02:07:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:53240 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750953AbcDDGHU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 02:07:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1458684196-15923-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> <20160323074012.GA17929@lst.de> <1458834360.2544.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 23:07:17 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mempool based chained scatterlist alloc/free api From: Ming Lin To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , lkml , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1383 Lines: 50 On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ming Lin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:46 AM, James Bottomley > wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 08:09 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig >>> wrote: >>> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:03:11PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >>> > > From: Ming Lin >>> > > >>> > > The fist 4 patches make the SG related >>> > > definitions/structs/functions >>> > > in SCSI code generic and the last patch move it to lib/sg_pool.c. >>> > > >>> > > I still keep the macro "SG_MEMPOOL_NR" since it's used in 3 >>> > > places. >>> > >>> > I don't ѕee the point, but I'm not going to block the series over >>> > it either. >>> > >>> > The new series looks really nice to me! >>> > >>> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig >>> >>> Hi James, >>> >>> This series touches several sub-systems. >>> What's the best way to merge it? >> >> It has a minor intrusion into >> >> drivers/ata/pata_icside.c | 2 +- >> drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c | 4 +- >> drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- >> >> Apart from that, it's all SCSI, so the SCSI tree would seem to be the >> best one. > > Are you OK to merge it? Hi James, Ping ... Are you OK to apply this series? Or any changes needed? Thanks. > > Thanks.