Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754848AbcDDJMv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 05:12:51 -0400 Received: from smtp.telecom.by ([213.184.225.46]:35129 "EHLO smtp.telecom.by" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751885AbcDDJMt (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 05:12:49 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 453 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 05:12:48 EDT Subject: Re: Backport patch from 4.2 to 3.18 To: "David S. Miller" References: <56D9F2C3.3030204@telecom.by> <56D9FD6A.4060107@oracle.com> <56E6EA59.5020302@oracle.com> Cc: Sasha Levin , stable , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , LKML From: Andrei Sharaev Message-ID: <57022E48.5030008@telecom.by> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:05:12 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56E6EA59.5020302@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3395 Lines: 64 Hi David, Could you help with this problem? -- Best regards, Andrei Sharaev BYAS-RIPE ISP Atlant Telecom aosharaev@telecom.by 14.03.2016 19:44, Sasha Levin пишет: > On 03/04/2016 04:26 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On 03/04/2016 03:40 PM, Andrei Sharaev wrote: >>>> Hi Sasha, >>>> >>>> Can you backport this patch for "inet-frag-fixes" to linux kernel 3.18 LTS? >>>> http://kernel.suse.com/cgit/kernel/commit/?h=v4.2-rc5&id=64b892ad2326348a5b8314167590d240e3bcc69e >>>> >>>> I get 1-5 kernel panics in month for linux kernels 3.18.24-3.18.26 at my NAT server with big IPv4 traffic (10-15 Gbps). >>>> My kernel panics have similar symptoms: >>>>>> <82>general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP >>>>>> <82>Modules linked in: bonding ipt_NETFLOW(O) xt_recent configfs x86_pkg_temp_thermal ixgbe(O) >>>>>> <86>CPU: 13 PID: 29908 Comm: kworker/13:2 Tainted: G IO 3.18.26 #1 >>>>>> <86>Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WT2/S2600WT2, BIOS SE5C610.86B.01.01.0005.101720141054 10/17/2014 >>>>>> <82>Workqueue: events inet_frag_worker >>>>>> <86>task: ffff88046cdba9a0 ti: ffff880454928000 task.ti: ffff880454928000 >>>>>> <82>RIP: 0010:[] [] inet_evict_bucket+0x109/0x160 >>>>>> <86>RSP: 0018:ffff88045492bd38 EFLAGS: 00010286 >>>>>> <86>RAX: ffff880441d0e001 RBX: dead0000001000c0 RCX: 000000018030002e >>>>>> <86>RDX: 000000018030002f RSI: ffff880441d0e000 RDI: dead0000001000c0 >>>>>> <86>RBP: ffff88045492bd88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88086cc88500 >>>>>> <86>R10: ffff88046fdb5c50 R11: ffffea0011074380 R12: 0000000000000002 >>>>>> <86>R13: ffffffff81e02200 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88083f0942a0 >>>>>> <86>FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88046fda0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >>>>>> <86>CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>>>>> <86>CR2: 00007fab8f466000 CR3: 000000085f66d000 CR4: 00000000001407e0 >>>>>> <86>Stack: >>>>>> <82> ffffffff81e05a78 ffffffff81e05a70 ffff88046cdba9a0 ffff88083f0942e0 >>>>>> <82> ffff88046f808c00 0000000000000079 ffffffff81e02200 ffffffff81e06200 >>>>>> <82> 0000000000000388 0000000000000007 ffff88045492bdf8 ffffffff815b928a >>>>>> <86>Call Trace: >>>>>> <82> [] inet_frag_worker+0x5a/0x230 >>>>>> <82> [] process_one_work+0x12d/0x330 >>>>>> <82> [] worker_thread+0x4b/0x450 >>>>>> <82> [] ? cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x10/0x10 >>>>>> <82> [] kthread+0xc4/0xe0 >>>>>> <82> [] ? finish_task_switch+0x49/0xc0 >>>>>> <82> [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170 >>>>>> <82> [] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 >>>>>> <82> [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170 >>>>>> <82>Code: f6 0f 85 73 ff ff ff 48 8b 45 b8 80 40 08 01 48 8b 7d c8 48 85 ff 74 23 48 83 ef 40 75 0d eb 1b 66 90 48 83 eb 40 48 89 df 74 10 <48> 8b 5f 40 41 ff 95 70 40 00 00 48 85 db 75 e7 48 83 c4 28 44 >>>>>> <22>RIP [] inet_evict_bucket+0x109/0x160 >>>>>> <82> RSP >> Hey Andrei, >> >> Thanks for the report. >> >> Usually David Miller (Cc'ed) handles backporting network commits. In this case, I see >> that he has elected not to backport it into 4.1 or 3.18, so I don't want to do it without >> getting an ack from him first. >> >> David, is it ok to backport these commits back to 3.18 (and probably 4.1)? > Ping?