Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:49:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:49:55 -0500 Received: from spc1.esa.lanl.gov ([128.165.67.191]:17792 "EHLO spc1.esa.lanl.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:49:44 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2 From: "Steven P. Cole" Reply-To: elenstev@mesatop.com To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20030319121055.685b9b8c.akpm@digeo.com> References: <20030319012115.466970fd.akpm@digeo.com> <1048103489.1962.87.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030319121055.685b9b8c.akpm@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1048107434.1743.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2-1mdk Date: 19 Mar 2003 13:57:14 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1612 Lines: 38 On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 13:10, Andrew Morton wrote: > Steven Cole wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 02:21, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/ > > > > > > > I am seeing a significant degradation of interactivity under load with > > recent -mm kernels. The load is dbench on a reiserfs file system with > > increasing numbers of clients. The test machine is single PIII, IDE, > > 256MB memory, all kernels PREEMPT. > > (This email brought to you while running dbench 128 on ext3) > > There's a pretty big reiserfs patch in -mm. Are you able to whip up > an ext2 partition and see if that displays the same problem? > I repeated the test on an ext3 partition, and the response with 28 dbench clients running is definitely better, although I'm starting to get some stalls of a couple seconds while typing this in Evolution on the machine under test. Now it's becoming intolerable, so I aborted the dbench run so I could finish this email. This was with 2.5.65-mm2 and elevator=as. I'll repeat soon with elevator=deadline. I didn't try typing in Evolution with 2.5.65-bk under high loads, so I'll also give that a try. Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired. Steven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/