Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755926AbcDDOZV (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:25:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52991 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754938AbcDDOZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:25:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:25:14 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: kbuild test robot Cc: Joerg Roedel , kbuild-all@01.org, Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Will Deacon , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux IOMMU , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu: Make use of phandle iterators in device-tree device-tree parsing Message-ID: <20160404142514.GH24141@suse.de> References: <20160323114707.GA17838@8bytes.org> <201603232325.ah8fLwoH%fengguang.wu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201603232325.ah8fLwoH%fengguang.wu@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1270 Lines: 25 On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18:25PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c: In function 'arm_smmu_device_dt_probe': > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c:1746:29: error: storage size of 'it' isn't known > struct of_phandle_iterator it; > ^ > >> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c:1815:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_for_each_phandle' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > of_for_each_phandle(&it, err, dev->of_node, > ^ > >> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c:1816:46: error: expected ';' before '{' token > "mmu-masters", "#stream-id-cells", 0) { > ^ > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c:1746:29: warning: unused variable 'it' [-Wunused-variable] > struct of_phandle_iterator it; > ^ > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c: At top level: > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c:473:12: warning: 'register_smmu_master' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > static int register_smmu_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > ^ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors Looks like this patch got compiled without the other patch in this set, right? Because the config builds perfectly fine here for me. Joerg