Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755998AbcDDPrc (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:47:32 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60146 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753575AbcDDPrb (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:47:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:47:27 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Rob Herring Cc: Joerg Roedel , Grant Likely , Will Deacon , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux IOMMU , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles Message-ID: <20160404154727.GI24141@suse.de> References: <1458669509-7178-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <20160323115457.GC17838@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 470 Lines: 13 On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through > > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree > > probably makes more sense. > > Sure, I can take them. Thanks! I am about to post a new version with all changes collected together and rebased to the latest upstream kernel. Joerg