Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:03:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:03:08 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:33802 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:03:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:01:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, akpm@digeo.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dev_t [1/3] Message-ID: <20030319220151.GA16947@kroah.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 22 On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:45:14PM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > Now that 2.5.65 is out, the next dev_t patch. > It was a bit large and unreadable, so I split it into > three clean pieces. Afterwards, since many people ask > for this, a fourth patch that actually changes the > type of dev_t (not to be applied yet, that is just for > playing). I've been beating on these three patches and don't seem to have any problems. And I see Andrew has put them in his -mm tree too. Andrew, I don't see any problem with sending them on to Linus if you want to (just the 3, not the 4th one :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/