Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:07:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:07:00 -0500 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:48647 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:06:58 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.21-pre5 kksymoops for i386/ia64 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:39:39 BST." <20030319153939.GA30899@averell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:17:45 +1100 Message-ID: <23436.1048112265@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 924 Lines: 21 On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:39:39 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: >On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 03:18:24AM +0100, Keith Owens wrote: >> ps. The 2.5 kallsyms code is incompatible with modutils 2.4, >> backporting the incomplete 2.5 kallsyms would only get debugging >> symbols for the kernel, not for modules. Changing modutils 2.4 is not >> an option, I will not introduce an incompatible change in the middle of >> a stable kernel series unless there is no choice (e.g. to fix a >> critical bug). > >At least for me not working in cross compile setups is a critical bug. >YMMV. How the hell can it be a critical bug when 2.4 kernels do not currently have _any_ kksymoops support? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/