Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:53:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:53:34 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:25861 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:53:33 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2 From: Robert Love To: elenstev@mesatop.com Cc: jjs , linux kernel In-Reply-To: <1048114307.1511.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> References: <20030319012115.466970fd.akpm@digeo.com> <1048103489.1962.87.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030319121055.685b9b8c.akpm@digeo.com> <1048107434.1743.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> <1048111359.1807.13.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> <3E78EC63.9050308@tmsusa.com> <1048114307.1511.12.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1048115072.775.108.camel@phantasy.awol.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-3) Date: 19 Mar 2003 18:04:32 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 713 Lines: 23 On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:51, Steven P. Cole wrote: > I'll try the different value of max_timeslice with dbench on > reiserfs next. That's where the lack of response was most evident. I am curious as to whether reverting sched-D4 fixes this. If not, the first step is seeing whether this is a bad decision made by the interactivity estimator. Something like: ps -eo pid,nice,priority,command for dbench, evolution, and X might be useful. Thanks, Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/