Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 04:03:33 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>, Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>,
        "security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>, security@ubuntu.com,
        security@debian.org, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] devpts: Teach /dev/ptmx to find the associated
 devpts via path lookup
Message-ID: <20160405030333.GL17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <878u0s3orx.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
 <1459819769-30387-1-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com>
 <20160405025425.GK17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160405025425.GK17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1116
Lines: 23

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:54:25AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> That, I take it, is a lookup for .. and buggering off if it fails *or* if
> we had been in caller's root or something that overmount it?  Not that the
> latter had been possible - root is a directory and can be overmounted only
> by another such, and we are called from ->open() of a device node.
> 
> > +	/* Remember the result of this permission check for later */
> > +	ret = inode_permission(path.dentry->d_inode, MAY_EXEC);
> > +	if (path_pts(&path))
> > +		goto fail;
> 
> Egads, man - you've just introduced a special function for looking up
> something named "pts" in a given directory!
> 
> The reason not to use kern_path() would be what, the fact that it doesn't
> allow starting at given location?  So let's make a variant that would - and
> rather than bothering with RCU, just go for something like (completely
> untested)

Ah...  Right, that would demand exec permissions on the starting point.
Still, this is incredibly ugly ;-/  I'll try to come up with something
more tolerable, but this "path_pts" thing is too ugly to live.  Seriously.