Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757542AbcDEKEK (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 06:04:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:1689 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751433AbcDEKEI (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 06:04:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,443,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="344859936" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/6] xen: add xen_pin_vcpu() to support calling functions on a dedicated pcpu To: Juergen Gross , , References: <1459833007-11618-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1459833007-11618-5-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <57038927.1030205@citrix.com> <57038D0E.1040708@suse.com> CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , From: David Vrabel Message-ID: <57038D8B.9050602@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:03:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57038D0E.1040708@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 298 Lines: 11 On 05/04/16 11:01, Juergen Gross wrote: > > No, I don't think this is a good idea. In the EINVAL or EBUSY case a > simple Xen admin command might be enough to make the next call succeed. > I don't want to disable pinning in this case. Ok. Acked-by: David Vrabel David