Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758297AbcDEMmY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:42:24 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:40362 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752396AbcDEMmW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:42:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:42:18 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Luca Abeni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation Message-ID: <20160405124218.GW3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1459523553-29089-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it> <1459523553-29089-4-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459523553-29089-4-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1553 Lines: 63 On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:12:29PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote: > +static void task_go_inactive(struct task_struct *p) > +{ > + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &p->dl; > + struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->inactive_timer; > + struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se); > + struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq); > + ktime_t now, act; > + s64 delta; > + u64 zerolag_time; s64 zerolag_time; > + > + WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_runtime == 0); > + > + /* If the inactive timer is already armed, return immediately */ > + if (hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) > + return; > + > + > + /* > + * We want the timer to fire at the "0 lag time", but considering > + * that it is actually coming from rq->clock and not from > + * hrtimer's time base reading. > + */ > + zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline - > + div64_long((dl_se->runtime * dl_se->dl_period), > + dl_se->dl_runtime); > + > + act = ns_to_ktime(zerolag_time); > + now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer); > + delta = ktime_to_ns(now) - rq_clock(rq); > + act = ktime_add_ns(act, delta); Would something like: zerolag_time -= rq_clock(rq); > + > + /* > + * If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active > + * utilization now, instead of starting a timer > + */ > + if (ktime_us_delta(act, now) < 0) { if (zerolag_time < 0) > + sub_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq); > + if (!dl_task(p)) > + __dl_clear_params(p); > + > + return; > + } > + > + get_task_struct(p); > + hrtimer_start(timer, act, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); hrtimer_start(timer, ns_to_ktime(zerolag), HRTIMER_MODE_REL); > +} Not be simpler ?