Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:52:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:52:54 -0500 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:42477 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:52:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:03:51 -0600 (CST) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Greg KH cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Hoogerhuis Subject: Re: Sleeping in illegal context with 2.5.65-mm2 In-Reply-To: <20030320043931.GC18787@kroah.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1060 Lines: 29 On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Greg KH wrote: > > Debug: sleeping function called from illegal context at mm/slab.c:1723 > > Call Trace: > > [] __might_sleep+0x5f/0x65 > > [] kmalloc+0x88/0x8f > > [] usb_alloc_urb+0x21/0x51 > > [] hci_usb_enable_intr+0x20/0xf8 [hci_usb] > > The call to usb_alloc_urb() here is being done with the GFP_ATOMIC flag, > which is correct. Do we need to fix up the warning message to prevent > false positives like this from happening? Not in my tree: (drivers/bluetooth/hci_sb.c) if (!(urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL))) return -ENOMEM; And the function is called in a write_lock_irqsave(), so the complaint is justified. (Also, I think __might_sleep() deliberately doesn't get triggered for GFP_ATOMIC already, as you suggested). --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/