Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758603AbcDEQxh (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:53:37 -0400 Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.146]:49800 "EHLO e23smtp04.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752344AbcDEQxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:53:35 -0400 X-IBM-Helo: d23dlp03.au.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:21:47 +0530 From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests Message-ID: <20160405165147.GC15993@naverao1-tp.in.ibm.com> References: <5e3cf7c4a971e6d2ff7a2d50bbec2e6e26883b84.1459850410.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <9b71e280481a9f84cd7dbb9e767fd08e6f4c0aef.1459850410.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5703E7B2.6050706@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5703E7B2.6050706@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16040516-0013-0000-0000-000004B26DDA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 899 Lines: 23 On 2016/04/05 09:28AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > >Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to > >sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get > >covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to > >quickly tag the precise problem. > > > >Cc: Alexei Starovoitov > >Cc: Daniel Borkmann > >Cc: "David S. Miller" > >Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli > >Cc: Michael Ellerman > >Cc: Paul Mackerras > >Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao > > Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of > available ppc instructions. Nice. > > I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit? Yes, all these tests pass on x86_64. - Naveen