Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759401AbcDESIJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:08:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:33624 "EHLO mail-lf0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758868AbcDESIG (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:08:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 01/15] ACPI: MCFG: Move mmcfg_list management to drivers/acpi To: Bjorn Helgaas References: <1455630825-27253-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <1455630825-27253-2-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <20160303225152.GA10472@localhost> <20160305041443.GA15110@localhost> <56DFE91E.10105@semihalf.com> <5703C7AB.2000306@semihalf.com> <20160405164122.GA9419@localhost> Cc: Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair , Arnd Bergmann , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , rafael@kernel.org, Hanjun Guo , Lorenzo Pieralisi , okaya@codeaurora.org, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair , Stefano Stabellini , robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, Marcin Wojtas , Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, David Daney , wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Jon Masters From: Tomasz Nowicki Message-ID: <5703FEFF.202@semihalf.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:07:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160405164122.GA9419@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 31 Hi Bjorn, On 05.04.2016 18:41, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > [...] >>>> >>> >>> As you pointed out raw_pci_{read|write} make things complicated, so IMO >>> we should either say they are absolutely necessary (and then think how >>> to simplify it) or just use simple bus-specific accessor (patch 02/15) >>> e.g. for ARM64. >>> >>> Any comments appreciated. >> >> Kindly reminder. I would like to move on with this patch set. Can >> you please comments on it so that we could decide which way to go. > > Can you repost your current proposal with a version number higher than > any previous ones? It's OK if the content is the same as v4; I just > think it's confusing if we resurrect v4 and have to follow discussion > from v3 to v4 to v5 and back to v4. The archives would be a bit of a > muddle. > Sure I will repost ASAP. Thanks! Tomasz