Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:19:50 -0700
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
Cc: Pramod Gurav <gpramod@codeaurora.org>, andy.gross@linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, okaya@codeaurora.org, architt@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled
Message-ID: <20160405181950.GD8930@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com>
References: <1458640151-15150-1-git-send-email-gpramod@codeaurora.org>
 <56F116AC.2000704@mm-sol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56F116AC.2000704@mm-sol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 657
Lines: 16

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
> > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the bam_init
> > for any such platform if DT property is set.
> > 
> > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C boards.
> > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA controller.
> 
> I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first.

was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an update in
my queue

-- 
~Vinod