Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 02:53:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 02:53:55 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:36066 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 02:53:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:04:49 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Joel Becker Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 Message-ID: <20030320080449.GL4990@suse.de> References: <20030319232812.GJ2835@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20030319175726.59d08fba.akpm@digeo.com> <20030320003858.GM2835@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030320003858.GM2835@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 971 Lines: 29 On Wed, Mar 19 2003, Joel Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:57:26PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Joel Becker wrote: > > > > > > WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 > > > > > > Runs: 1374.22 1487.19 1437.26 > > > > > > > That is with elevator=as? > > Yes, it is as. On Nick's recommendation I didn't consider a > deadline run a priority. The regular deadline runs have been 1550-1590, > which is indeed statistically significant. Hmm that's a bit odd IMHO, the deadline runs are nice for comparison. If there's a variation between -mmX and -mmY, and deadline + as have consistent scores, then it would be a good clue. Besides, deadline is still the most solid choice. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/