Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759904AbcDESvQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:51:16 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:36589 "EHLO mail-yw0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759858AbcDESvN (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:51:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160405164122.GA9419@localhost> References: <1455630825-27253-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <1455630825-27253-2-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <20160303225152.GA10472@localhost> <20160305041443.GA15110@localhost> <56DFE91E.10105@semihalf.com> <5703C7AB.2000306@semihalf.com> <20160405164122.GA9419@localhost> From: Jayachandran C Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 00:20:32 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 01/15] ACPI: MCFG: Move mmcfg_list management to drivers/acpi To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Tomasz Nowicki , Arnd Bergmann , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , rafael@kernel.org, Hanjun Guo , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sinan Kaya , jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, Stefano Stabellini , robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, Marcin Wojtas , Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, David Daney , Wangyijing , Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Jon Masters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1683 Lines: 46 Hi Bjorn, On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Hi Tomasz, > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:11:55PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > > On 09.03.2016 10:13, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > > >Hi Bjorn, > > > > > >Thanks for your pointers! See my comments inline. Aslo, can you please > > >have a look at my previous patch set v4 and check how many of your > > >comments are already addressed there. We may want to back to it then. > > > > > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/4/646 > > >Especially patches [0-6] which handle MMCONFIG refactoring. > > > > > > > > >On 05.03.2016 05:14, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [...] > > > > > >As you pointed out raw_pci_{read|write} make things complicated, so IMO > > >we should either say they are absolutely necessary (and then think how > > >to simplify it) or just use simple bus-specific accessor (patch 02/15) > > >e.g. for ARM64. > > > > > >Any comments appreciated. > > > Kindly reminder. I would like to move on with this patch set. Can > > you please comments on it so that we could decide which way to go. > > Can you repost your current proposal with a version number higher than > any previous ones? It's OK if the content is the same as v4; I just > think it's confusing if we resurrect v4 and have to follow discussion > from v3 to v4 to v5 and back to v4. The archives would be a bit of a > muddle. I had posted a patchset based on your suggestions in this thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/17/621 Would appreciate any comments on that. Like I said in the earlier mail, if this is a reasonable approach, I can combine this with Tomasz patchset to provide the full patchset for ACPI support. Thanks, JC.