Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760168AbcDEV2E (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:28:04 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:17408 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751628AbcDEV2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2016 17:28:01 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,445,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="952398058" From: "Koul, Vinod" To: "andy.gross@linaro.org" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "svarbanov@mm-sol.com" , "architt@codeaurora.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "okaya@codeaurora.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "Williams, Dan J" , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , "gpramod@codeaurora.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Thread-Index: AQHRhCBJiXvGzscAaE+ijMWAmMP4hp9k3ZoAgBbpoQD//9aCAIAAAdMA Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:27:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1459891672.3136.55.camel@intel.com> References: <1458640151-15150-1-git-send-email-gpramod@codeaurora.org> <56F116AC.2000704@mm-sol.com> <20160405181950.GD8930@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com> <20160405212120.GA3873@hector.attlocal.net> In-Reply-To: <20160405212120.GA3873@hector.attlocal.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.254.177.104] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <2A99454BB1A57E498182F3AB4AB59444@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id u35LS8F0030475 Content-Length: 1033 Lines: 30 On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 16:21 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are > > > > managed remotely > > > > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. > > > > So skip the bam_init > > > > for any such platform if DT property is set. > > > > > > > > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C > > > > boards. > > > > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA > > > > controller. > > > > > > I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first. > > > > was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an > > update in > > my queue > > No updates that I can see. The original is here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113 > And that seemed to have some discussion so I dont recall looking at it. -- ~Vinod