Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:33:17 -0500
From: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bam dma fixes and one dt extension
Message-ID: <20160405213317.GB3873@hector.attlocal.net>
References: <1448961299-15161-1-git-send-email-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1448961299-15161-1-git-send-email-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 691
Lines: 20

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Here are three bam dma fixes, which I made during testing qcrypto
> driver. The first one is a real fix, the second one is related to
> peripherals on which the BAM IP is initialized by remote execution
> environment, and the third one is a sleeping bug IMO.
> 
> The last patch is a extension again for peripherals which BAM is
> remotely controlled by other execution environment.
> 
> All patches has been tested on db410c board with apq8016.
> 

Stan,

Can you resend these patches w/ updates?  Or at least the remote control patch
if you can get that out faster.  And also include the dmaengine list.

Regards,

Andy