Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:08:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:08:29 -0500 Received: from mail.idilis.net ([217.156.85.2]:16237 "EHLO mail.idilis.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 07:08:28 -0500 Message-ID: <3E79B200.6030305@easynet.ro> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:20:16 +0200 From: Alex Damian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ro-RO; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830 X-Accept-Language: ro, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: New PixelView driver Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 575 Lines: 19 I wrote a PixelView (Cirrus Logic GD-5465) tuner&grabber device driver. (V4L interface) I'm not sure to which kernel should I patch against (I developed using vanilla 2.4.20). Should I try diff's against current 2.4.x , or try to make it to the 2.5.current and drop support for 2.4.x ? or maybe both. Respect, Alex Damian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/