Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932483AbcDFIOr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:14:47 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34603 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753843AbcDFIOi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:14:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB0889D75DC56E180D3508E7A1F89F0@HE1PR04MB0889.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1459480051-3701-1-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com>
	<CAPDyKFqgMCvbqMYZ-uM-rTnVvfJkCYbhv2kucCRyNyc9FWoR=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<HE1PR04MB0889D75DC56E180D3508E7A1F89F0@HE1PR04MB0889.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:14:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp8GDzSkpbTKoRL=rwiBrsWmsgN95zB-QJwfZTnq4M8BA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v7, 0/5] Fix eSDHC host version register bug
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>, Scott Wood <scott.wood@nxp.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>,
        Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@freescale.com>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo.xie@nxp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 960
Lines: 37

>>
>> I was about to queue this for next, when I noticed that checkpatch is
>> complaining/warning lots about these patches. Can you please a round of
>> checkpatch and fix what makes sense.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>
> [Lu Yangbo-B47093] Sorry about this, Uffe...

No worries!

> Should I ignore the warnings that update MAINTAINERS?

drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c isn't part of the MAINTAINERS file, it should be.

I also realize that the FREESCALE QUICC ENGINE LIBRARY section
drivers/soc/fsl/qe/* also need an active maintainer, as it's currently
orphan.

Perhaps we should have create a new section for drivers/soc/fsl/*
instead that covers all of the above? Maybe you or Scott are
interested to pick it up?

I also noted that, "include/linux/fsl/" isn't present in MAINTAINERS,
please add that as well.

> Regarding the 'undocumented' warning, I will added a patch updates doc before all the patches, Ok?

Yes, good!

>
> Thanks a lot :)
>

Kind regards
Uffe