Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:56:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:56:31 -0500 Received: from mail.zmailer.org ([62.240.94.4]:62095 "EHLO mail.zmailer.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:56:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:07:28 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: "Richard B. Johnson" Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch , lkml Subject: Re: Bottleneck on /dev/null Message-ID: <20030320170728.GQ29167@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: <28588.1048178012@frodo.gams.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1014 Lines: 29 On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:01:06PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: ... > Yes. That's better. It may have been a diagnostic error > in the code of the first person reporting this --also. > > The data-rate is so high that I might have wrapped several > times! I didn't think it would be that high, only 2 to 3 > gigibyte/second, not over 4 Gb/s (with 130MHz RAM no less) Furthermore, in Linux you are really measuring syscall overhead to "/dev/null" write, which does never do memory transfers of any kind from user-space to kernel. ... > Its interesting that the data-rate is higher with the network > plugged in and getting all those M$ broadcast messages. But, as > expected, its more stable without. Quite so. > Cheers, > Dick Johnson /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/