Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755774AbcDGKoL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 06:44:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37932 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755438AbcDGKoI (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 06:44:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:44:03 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: corbet@lwn.net, andreas.werner@men.de, tony@atomide.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] mfd: Add devm_ apis for mfd_add_devices and mfd_release_devices Message-ID: <20160407104403.GZ3323@x1> References: <1459856912-17859-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1459856912-17859-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1459856912-17859-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4063 Lines: 136 On Tue, 05 Apr 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Add device managed APIs devm_mfd_add_devices() and > devm_mfd_remove_devices() for the APIs mfd_add_devices() > and mfd_remove_devices(). Nit: Line wrap after "devm_mfd_remove_devices()" instead. > This helps in reducing code in error path and sometimes > removal of .remove callback for driver unbind. s/for/during/ > Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan > --- > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/mfd/core.h | 7 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c > index 409da01..145712e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c > @@ -334,6 +334,68 @@ void mfd_remove_devices(struct device *parent) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mfd_remove_devices); > > +static void devm_mfd_dev_release(struct device *dev, void *res) > +{ > + mfd_remove_devices(dev); > +} > + > +/** > + * devm_mfd_add_devices - Resource managed version of mfd_add_devices() > + * > + * This returns the 0 on success otherwise error number in the failure. "Returns 0 on success or an appropriate negative error number on failure." > + * The allocated mfd devices will automatically be released when the s/mfd/MFD/ > + * device is unbound. > + */ > +int devm_mfd_add_devices(struct device *dev, int id, > + const struct mfd_cell *cells, int n_devs, > + struct resource *mem_base, > + int irq_base, struct irq_domain *domain) > +{ > + struct device **ptr; > + int ret; > + > + ptr = devres_alloc(devm_mfd_dev_release, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ptr) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ret = mfd_add_devices(dev, id, cells, n_devs, mem_base, > + irq_base, domain); > + if (!ret) { > + *ptr = dev; > + devres_add(dev, ptr); > + } else { > + devres_free(ptr); > + } Switch these round. If you encounter a problem, free and return. If not, skip the error handling and add the device outside of the if(). > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_mfd_add_devices); > + > +static int devm_mfd_devs_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data) > +{ > + struct device **r = res; > + > + if (WARN_ON(!r || !*r)) > + return 0; > + > + return *r == data; > +} > + > +/** > + * devm_mfd_remove_device - Resource managed version of mfd_remove_devices() > + * @dev: Device for which which resource was allocated. Did you proof read your own writing? Pleaes re-word. > + * Remove all mfd devices added on the device. s/mfd/MFD/ 'D' already means devices, so here you are saying "devices devices". Please re-word. Besides, you need to be more specific as to which "devices on the devices" you are detailing, since this sentence doesn't really make a great deal of sense. > + * Normally this function will not need to be called and the resource > + * management code will ensure that the resource is freed. Then what is the purpose of providing it? Do you have a user? > + */ > +void devm_mfd_remove_devices(struct device *dev) > +{ > + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_mfd_dev_release, > + devm_mfd_devs_match, dev)); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_mfd_remove_devices); > + > int mfd_clone_cell(const char *cell, const char **clones, size_t n_clones) > { > struct mfd_cell cell_entry; > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/core.h > index bc6f7e0..d658d7f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mfd/core.h > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/core.h > @@ -131,4 +131,11 @@ static inline int mfd_add_hotplug_devices(struct device *parent, > > extern void mfd_remove_devices(struct device *parent); > > +extern int devm_mfd_add_devices(struct device *dev, int id, > + const struct mfd_cell *cells, int n_devs, > + struct resource *mem_base, > + int irq_base, struct irq_domain *irq_domain); > + > +extern void devm_mfd_remove_devices(struct device *dev); > + > #endif -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog