Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756920AbcDGQub (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:50:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49182 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756553AbcDGQu3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:50:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/5] Thread-local ABI system call: cache CPU number of running thread To: Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra References: <1459789313-4917-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1459789313-4917-2-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <5702A037.60200@zytor.com> <492303698.44994.1459799188052.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <856357054.45028.1459802903401.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <5703E191.2040707@redhat.com> <20160405164722.GB3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <570621E5.7060306@redhat.com> <20160407103158.GP3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <570638D9.7010108@redhat.com> <20160407111938.GR3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-api , Paul Turner , Andrew Hunter , Andy Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Dave Watson , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk , Boqun Feng From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <57068FCC.8000701@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:50:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 410 Lines: 12 On 04/07/2016 06:39 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Can anybody give a *coherent* and actual *real* reason why the kernel > would ever care about anything else? We already have a similar per-thread data structure, the robust mutex list. The CPU ID is another one. So it's conceivable we might get further such fields in the future. (AFAICS set_robust_list was designed with such extensions in mind.) Florian