Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:02:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:02:08 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:47086 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:01:16 -0500 Subject: LTP version 20030306 To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, ltp-announce@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: lge@us.ibm.com, lindajs@us.ibm.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 Message-ID: From: "Doug Ramier" Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:12:00 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d27ml101/27/M/IBM(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 03/20/2003 04:12:02 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1027 Lines: 30 We have found that in the past several months that the LTP version appears to become "buggier" with each successive release. >From the patches that are coming across this list there are an incredible number of problems. After overcoming problems with the compilation, we are getting between 50 and 130 failures on 64 and 32 bit versions which with 20030206 we had on the order of a dozen. I have a few questions: 1) Is everyone getting a "large" number of false failures? 2) Are the tests checked out before being released by SourceForge? 3) Are the tests only verified on Intel? How about PowerPC and iSeries? 4) Is there a version released after the release that has the 205 patches installed? Thanks, Doug Ramier pSeries / iSeries Linux Testing 507/253-2186 t/l 553-2186 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/