Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758254AbcDHMDz (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:03:55 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f195.google.com ([209.85.161.195]:34601 "EHLO mail-yw0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752633AbcDHMDx (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:03:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:03:38 -0400 From: William Breathitt Gray To: Guenter Roeck Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, wim@iguana.be, linus.walleij@linaro.org, gnurou@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] watchdog: ebc-c384_wdt: Utilize the ISA bus driver Message-ID: <20160408120338.GA18202@sophia> References: <1f5bf2e21006f0fd4f10ab3948cf69a737c0b039.1460040201.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <20160408003535.GA10211@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160408003535.GA10211@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1181 Lines: 28 On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:35:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >I am a bit concerend that the newly introduced ISA_BUS is not automatically >enabled. Effectively this means that all drivers depending on it will >be disabled until someone enables ISA_BUS in the distribution. > >Is this a concern for anyone but me ? > >Anyway, since you are the driver maintainer, I assume that you are ok >with it, so > >Acked-by: Guenter Roeck > >Side note for Wim: ISA_BUS was introduced with commit b3c1be1b789c >("base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency") in -next. > >Guenter Since the ISA bus lacks standardized probing functionality, and the majority of ISA devices I've encountered expect the user to start writing to the device's I/O port addresses from the get-go, I think ISA_BUS should remain an explicit dependency rather than become selected when a user chooses a driver. That is to say, it is more appropriate for a user to explicitly enable ISA_BUS if their system has an ISA bus; otherwise a user may enable a driver with the expectation of a device probe, whereas the driver will simply start writing to I/O port addresses unexpectedly. William Breathitt Gray