Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758194AbcDHRzL (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:55:11 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:50173 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754325AbcDHRzI (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:55:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:54:56 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Rob Herring , Ivaylo Dimitrov , broonie@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regulator: twl: Provide of_map_mode for twl4030 Message-ID: <20160408175456.GY16484@atomide.com> References: <20160404222638.GM2350@sirena.org.uk> <1459835974-31664-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> <20160407175745.GK32257@rob-hp-laptop> <20160408154907.GT16484@atomide.com> <20160408160828.GA10562@earth> <20160408161923.GW16484@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160408161923.GW16484@atomide.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1331 Lines: 33 * Tony Lindgren [160408 09:21]: > * Sebastian Reichel [160408 09:09]: > > Hi Tony, > > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 08:49:07AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Rob Herring [160407 10:58]: > > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:59:34AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > > > > > of_map_mode is needed so to be possible to set initial regulators mode from > > > > > the board DTS. Otherwise, for DT boot, regulators are left in their default > > > > > state after reset/reboot. Document device specific modes as well. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov > > > > > --- > > > > > .../bindings/regulator/twl-regulator.txt | 6 ++++++ > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > > > > > > I'd like to test these patches, but I don't know which combination > > > of patches needed? It seems we're waiting for an update on at least > > > one of the patches in this series? > > > > > > Might be best to repost the whole series so people can test the > > > right patches. > > > > As far as I can see Mark has already queued all patches in his > > for-next branch and they are already in today's linux-next, so > > you can just test linux-next. > > OK thanks will do. Yup PM seems to work just fine with these. Tony