Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754420AbcDJO7e (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:59:34 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53185 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753257AbcDJO7d (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:59:33 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:59:30 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
        target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        Jay Freyensee <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagig@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/host: Add missing blk_integrity tag_size + flags
	assignments
Message-ID: <20160410145930.GA21909@lst.de>
References: <1460171082-7212-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1460171082-7212-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 97
Lines: 2

Does NVMe really force ATO=1?  Sorry, didn't have much time to spend
with that part of the spec.