Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753596AbcDKI5G (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 04:57:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:34246 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820AbcDKI5C (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 04:57:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:56:58 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Henry Chen Cc: Matthias Brugger , John Crispin , Sascha Hauer , Flora Fu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: mt6397: irq domain should initialize before mfd_add_devices() Message-ID: <20160411085658.GN4592@x1> References: <1460098729-25549-1-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1460098729-25549-1-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2859 Lines: 93 On Fri, 08 Apr 2016, Henry Chen wrote: > Some sub driver like RTC module need irq domain from parent to create > irq mapping when driver initialize. so move mt6397_irq_init() before > mfd_add_devices(). > > Acked-by: John Crispin > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen > --- > This series fixed the below warning based on "Linux kernel v4.6-rc1" > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 132 at kernel/mediatek/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:471 > irq_create_mapping+0xc4/0xd0 > > Changes in V2: Add two patch for error handle checking. > --- > drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c > index 8e8d932..a879223 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c > @@ -270,22 +270,36 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto fail_irq; > } > > + pmic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + > switch (id & 0xff) { > case MT6323_CID_CODE: > - pmic->int_con[0] = MT6323_INT_CON0; > - pmic->int_con[1] = MT6323_INT_CON1; > - pmic->int_status[0] = MT6323_INT_STATUS0; > - pmic->int_status[1] = MT6323_INT_STATUS1; > + if (pmic->irq > 0) { > + pmic->int_con[0] = MT6323_INT_CON0; > + pmic->int_con[1] = MT6323_INT_CON1; > + pmic->int_status[0] = MT6323_INT_STATUS0; > + pmic->int_status[1] = MT6323_INT_STATUS1; > + ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + I don't think you need all these ugly indenting. Just harmlessly return in mt6397_irq_init() if there are no IRQs present. > ret = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6323_devs, > ARRAY_SIZE(mt6323_devs), NULL, 0, NULL); > break; > > case MT6397_CID_CODE: > case MT6391_CID_CODE: > - pmic->int_con[0] = MT6397_INT_CON0; > - pmic->int_con[1] = MT6397_INT_CON1; > - pmic->int_status[0] = MT6397_INT_STATUS0; > - pmic->int_status[1] = MT6397_INT_STATUS1; > + if (pmic->irq > 0) { > + pmic->int_con[0] = MT6397_INT_CON0; > + pmic->int_con[1] = MT6397_INT_CON1; > + pmic->int_status[0] = MT6397_INT_STATUS0; > + pmic->int_status[1] = MT6397_INT_STATUS1; > + ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > ret = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, mt6397_devs, > ARRAY_SIZE(mt6397_devs), NULL, 0, NULL); > break; > @@ -296,13 +310,6 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > break; > } > > - pmic->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - if (pmic->irq > 0) { > - ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - } > - > fail_irq: > if (ret) { > irq_domain_remove(pmic->irq_domain); -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog