From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
CC: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: dwc3: make dwc3_debugfs_init return value
 be void
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: dwc3: make dwc3_debugfs_init return value
 be void
Thread-Index: AQHRkXtvOGw23YfLWUyQ22+PaN9B8J+D6z8AgAC3HNA=
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:19:11 +0000
Message-ID: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A05CFE237@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1460108062-31398-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com>
 <1460108062-31398-2-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com>
 <878u0kpnod.fsf@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <878u0kpnod.fsf@intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1334
Lines: 54

> >  	root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(dwc->dev), NULL);
> > -	if (!root) {
> > -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -		goto err0;
> > -	}
> > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(root))
> > +		return;
> 
> We can definitely keep on going, but I'd still like to know that we
> enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_FS but failed to create a file or a
> directory. Seems like this should read as follows:
> 
> 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(root)) {
>         	if (!root)
>                 	dev_err(dwc->dev, "Can't create debugfs root\n");
>         	return;
> 	}
> 
> ditto to all bellow.
> 
Balbi, so you mean we should not let the failure go silent,  right?

> >  	dwc->root = root;
> >
> >  	dwc->regset = kzalloc(sizeof(*dwc->regset), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!dwc->regset) {
> > -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -		goto err1;
> > +		debugfs_remove_recursive(root);
> 
> you're now duplicating debugfs_remove_recursive(root) in all braches and
> that's error prone. It's probably better to keep our gotos, but change
> them so they read as follows:
> 
> 	if (!dwc->regset)
>         	goto err1;
> 
> 	[...]
> 
>         return; /* this is our successful exit point */
> 
> err1:
> 	debugfs_remove_recursive(root);
>         kfree(dwc->regset);
> 
> 
> --
> Balbi

No, no need anymore. Because no branch share this code now.
Then remove the goto would make code a little clear.

Thanks,
Du, Changbin