Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755443AbcDKOHg (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:07:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:38553 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754639AbcDKOHe (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:07:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:07:30 +0200 From: Thierry Reding To: Mark Brown Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas , Jon Hunter , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] regulator: core: Resolve supply earlier Message-ID: <20160411140730.GA27400@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <1460038959-21592-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <570B8376.6030505@nvidia.com> <20160411114612.GD17743@ulmo.ba.sec> <20160411125814.GE3351@sirena.org.uk> <20160411130914.GA16994@ulmo.ba.sec> <570BAA68.2000701@osg.samsung.com> <20160411135715.GG3351@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160411135715.GG3351@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1750 Lines: 46 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:57:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:12AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >=20 > > Now $SUBJECT will break the use case for Bjorn's commit AFAIU. >=20 > Yes, it'll break some systems. Okay, so how do we proceed here? Currently Jetson TK1 is broken because bypass mode requires the parent to be available at probe time due to new code that's now doing a regulator_get_voltage() during the initial call to set_machine_constraints(). Perhaps to unbreak boards the original commit that caused this failure fa93fd4ecc9c ("regulator: core: Ensure we are at least in bounds for our constraints") should be reverted for now? Thierry --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXC6+fAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhzl4P/3yqLE7fEdB0aYOQJUDKSby5 MRHF4xManbIYkoRnlvqCnKIipMTpJVPSYYeJz7BuD9hTnpCSBIPhLke9eazGw+xO twWlDFJpuOn986++LbMExIjl7fV2gBfe5ETihYNvdH4wkUl7tLgDGPfzrewXRfjI zzaZq8nK1I0/YNjrdTp3WIiDadEaEy/1ZCS1vtmNpukrZUT1sKK2W6XYwFeYpKZn UhejAzjKGMVqcUUJH758LWc8nlte85SLPZL3t6lucHOYMYNwONwbmnruMuTYiaR6 ZNDTfYRjfOAFXqWXaVxFS2v1QLLHT7zAc8+22d74URNv8AzifvtHFhi10fFvYLb6 agFCvHpUy6B+Chq3Gu8kV1lJ+BA5wifisN9Zqumb7FqygAtCQJJkcHl3zkYjXUze 1PYARRRW9Uy0MBXzgsrTZfiLBKUSzzl5HiWSH0YVm18dAF8jOejp8Q503TSGWGPh JFrR80LULRgEUCVcrGFPJedFa9bAI1Ae+gzZs0VEH6ezohy9keiXIaEgUD8K522B j7qy7/tpCwxlzgI8L0Gk8feO7KBzPFFje/m6adj6BfqDkMF2JW+gyJ7VZpJonBJ3 FRGAn0J/jABZZ8gkeAQUTWUJfKf6lSCzvtKaUH3X+xRBMvFQ1VdI6S/G3P3WHbnC DMcSGhZ6NXZy4ny/17Cs =RnWz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--