Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754326AbcDKQkD (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:40:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:32848 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651AbcDKQkA (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:40:00 -0400 Message-ID: <570BD354.2000100@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:09:48 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Shaohua Li , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM References: <1460388039-20282-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20160411155147.GB9288@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> <570BCD85.6090807@gmail.com> <20160411162306.GC9288@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20160411162306.GC9288@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 940 Lines: 33 On Monday 11 April 2016 09:53 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> L stands for "Mailing list that is relevant to this area", and this is a >> mailing list. :) > > Your proposed patch isn't changing the L entry, so this is of no relevance. Sorry, I am not understanding. The current entry in MAINTAINERS is: DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM) M: Alasdair Kergon M: Mike Snitzer M: dm-devel@redhat.com L: dm-devel@redhat.com ... So my patch just removed the line : "M: dm-devel@redhat.com" So now the entry becomes : DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM) M: Alasdair Kergon M: Mike Snitzer L: dm-devel@redhat.com ... So, now it correctly shows dm-devel@redhat.com as a mailing list which should have cc to all the patches related to LVM. Or am I understanding this wrong? regards sudip