Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754169AbcDKT4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:56:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:36538 "EHLO mail-lf0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbcDKT4E (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:56:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:55:57 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Chanwoo Choi Cc: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com, kgene@kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux.amoon@gmail.com, m.reichl@fivetechno.de, tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de, inki.dae@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] PM / devferq: Add generic exynos bus frequency driver and new passive governor Message-ID: <20160411195557.GA6426@kozik-lap> References: <1460347078-15175-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <570B218E.5000908@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <570B218E.5000908@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 913 Lines: 25 On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Dear Myungjoo and Krzysztof, > > This patch-set already get the acked-by or signed-off-by tag > from Exynos SoC and DEVFREQ maintainer except for patch10. > > If there is no comment, could you pick this patch-set? I cannot find any description of dependencies between the patches so I assume the obvious one: DTS patches do not depend on anything. This means that: 1. driver/devfreq related changes (including dt-bindings documentation) go to Myungjoo, 2. I can pick DTS changes. But first I would like to see the bindings documentation beeing applied by someone as a proof that there won't be more development in DTS in these series. There is no sense of picking DTS if after comments from Rob, you will rework them, right? Anyway I see Rob's questions. For these bindings I think you should get DT-guys ack first. Best regards, Krzysztof