Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754858AbcDKUPH (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:15:07 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f195.google.com ([209.85.213.195]:34859 "EHLO mail-ig0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751623AbcDKUPC (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:15:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: cw00.choi@samsung.com In-Reply-To: <20160411195557.GA6426@kozik-lap> References: <1460347078-15175-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <570B218E.5000908@samsung.com> <20160411195557.GA6426@kozik-lap> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:15:01 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/20] PM / devferq: Add generic exynos bus frequency driver and new passive governor From: Chanwoo Choi To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: "myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" , Kukjin Kim , Kyungmin Park , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King - ARM Linux , Anand Moon , Markus Reichl , Tobias Jakobi , "inki.dae@samsung.com" , linux-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , linux-samsung-soc , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1374 Lines: 44 Hi Krzysztof, On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:01:18PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> Dear Myungjoo and Krzysztof, >> >> This patch-set already get the acked-by or signed-off-by tag >> from Exynos SoC and DEVFREQ maintainer except for patch10. >> >> If there is no comment, could you pick this patch-set? > > I cannot find any description of dependencies between the patches so I > assume the obvious one: DTS patches do not depend on anything. This > means that: > 1. driver/devfreq related changes (including dt-bindings documentation) > go to Myungjoo, > 2. I can pick DTS changes. Yes. > > But first I would like to see the bindings documentation beeing applied > by someone as a proof that there won't be more development in DTS in > these series. There is no sense of picking DTS if after comments from > Rob, you will rework them, right? I already discussed the Rob's question on December, last year on patchset[1]. But, after that, I didn't receive the any reply from him. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/943 So, I thought that there is no comment. But, today, he give some question after 4 months. But I'll again reply to Rob's question. > > Anyway I see Rob's questions. For these bindings I think you should get > DT-guys ack first. OK. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi