Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756853AbcDLTqk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:46:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:35904 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756110AbcDLTqi (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:46:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160412184147.GA92432@davidb.org> References: <20160407231023.5f1307ffc79f0cdd880eedb7@gmail.com> <20160412174607.GA92143@davidb.org> <20160412184147.GA92432@davidb.org> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:46:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AQnJb6qQiCB4zWBRRaykA2KXCjs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Introduce GCC plugin infrastructure From: Kees Cook To: David Brown , Jeff Law Cc: Emese Revfy , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , linux-kbuild , PaX Team , Brad Spengler , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , Rasmus Villemoes , Fengguang Wu , Dmitry Vyukov , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1661 Lines: 52 On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:41 AM, David Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:27:52AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Awesome! Thanks for testing this. I still need to finish getting my >> arm64 environment built... > > > I've been using: > http://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/ > > for most stuff. > >> Do you happen to know if there's already a gcc bug open for the make >> install problem? > > > Linaro toolchain bug: > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2123 > > Patch to fix it > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00522.html > > It is supposed to be included in the linaro 5.3-2016.03 snapshot. > I've pinged Christophe to see if I can get any insight into when that > will be available. Looks like it's in the upstream tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=bfe972081c3c75019fa5a6e883dcbeb5e03eea18 I'm not sure how GCC does bug fix releases. Is this going to be in 5.4 or 5.3.1? (Is there such a thing as 5.3.1 planned?) I've CCed Jeff in case he's got a moment to peek at this. > It is kind of nice to see that when it fails, it prints a helpful > message, though: > > scripts/Makefile.gcc-plugins:22: *** error, your gcc installation does not > support plugins, perhaps the necessary headers are missing?. Stop. > > I think it is OK to include this, even with the patches still bubbling > through gcc releases. It prints a helpful message when it doesn't > work, and is only going to be selected if specifically requested. Yeah, absolutely. It works on the other architectures, and will soon work on arm64 too. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security