Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965084AbcDLUaE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:30:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:35019 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932823AbcDLUaC (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1460492999.6473.599.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: TCP reaching to maximum throughput after a long time From: Eric Dumazet To: Ben Greear Cc: "Machani, Yaniv" , netdev , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Yuchung Cheng , Nandita Dukkipati , open list , "Kama, Meirav" Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:29:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <570D5944.5070100@candelatech.com> References: <1460472764.6473.589.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <570D0E94.3080006@candelatech.com> <570D566B.8050302@candelatech.com> <1460492253.6473.596.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <570D5944.5070100@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 724 Lines: 20 On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 13:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > It worked well enough for years that I didn't even know other algorithms were > available. It was broken around 4.0 time, and I reported it to the list, > and no one seemed to really care enough to do anything about it. I changed > to reno and ignored the problem as well. > > It is trivially easy to see the regression when using ath10k NIC, and from this email > thread, I guess other NICs have similar issues. Since it is so trivial, why don't you start a bisection ? I asked a capture, I did not say ' switch to Reno or whatever ', right ? Guessing is nice, but investigating and fixing is better. Do not assume that nothing can be done, please ? Thanks.