Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:11:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:10:35 -0500 Received: from ip68-101-124-193.oc.oc.cox.net ([68.101.124.193]:38797 "EHLO ip68-101-124-193.oc.oc.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:09:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:20:34 -0800 From: "Barry K. Nathan" To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [2.5.65] Broken gcc test Message-ID: <20030321202034.GA3101@ip68-101-124-193.oc.oc.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 815 Lines: 20 On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:14:16PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > It seems that a test for the frame pointer gcc bug was incorrectly added > to the build process, rejecting all 2.96 compilers (which generate better > code than 3.2) instead of just the broken ones. [snip] AFAICT Linus did this intentionally: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0303.1/1031.html "Yeah, it will get some fixed compilers too, but that's just not worth worrying about - people will just have to turn off CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and be happy." -Barry K. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/