Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754311AbcDMQO4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:14:56 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:46402 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752313AbcDMQOy (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:14:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:14:50 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger Cc: Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Alexandre Belloni , Wenyou Yang , Josh Wu , Ezequiel Garcia , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Stefan Agner , Kyungmin Park , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, punnaiah choudary kalluri , Priit Laes , Kamal Dasu , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Harvey Hunt , Archit Taneja , Han Xu , Huang Shijie Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/52] mtd: rework ECC layout definition Message-ID: <20160413181450.449634a5@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1459354505-32551-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> References: <1459354505-32551-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 922 Lines: 28 On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:14:15 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hello, > > Hopefully the last version of this patchset (but don't be sad, I'm not > done bothering you with NAND related patches :-)). > > If possible, I'd like to have as much Tested/Reviewed/Acked-by tags as > possible, particularly on the changes done in arch/arm and arch/mips > (since the last set of commits depends on those changes, I'd like to > take them in my nand/next branch, even if this imply creating an > immutable branch for the ARM and MIPS maintainers). It's been around for quite some time now, and got several Acked/Tested/Reviewed-by tags. Let's push that on nand/next and see if someone complains in which case I drop those patches before sending my PR to Brian. Thanks for your reviews. Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com