Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755141AbcDMSWW (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:22:22 -0400 Received: from torres.zugschlus.de ([85.214.131.164]:56636 "EHLO torres.zugschlus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753751AbcDMSWU (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:22:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:22:14 +0200 From: Marc Haber To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andrey Korolyov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kvm ML Subject: Re: Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host Message-ID: <20160413182214.GB7600@torres.zugschlus.de> References: <20160317165435.GB3022@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160317181128.GA30324@pd.tnic> <20160318184929.GA949@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160318220429.GH7817@pd.tnic> <20160319000837.GF10135@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160320133158.GD4230@pd.tnic> <20160320182516.GE4230@pd.tnic> <20160320185813.GG4230@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160320185813.GG4230@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 688 Lines: 16 On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 07:58:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > So I'm not sure what even happens here yet. I haven't seen anything out > of the ordinary in Marc's dmesg and I wasn't able to reproduce either. > So would it be good to try with "npt=0"? Sure, why not. npt=0 goes on the kernel command line of the host or of the guest? Or is it a KVM option? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421