Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753254AbcDNA4Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:56:25 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:3951 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752086AbcDNA4X (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:56:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Is it a bug for nfs on udp6 mode or kernel? To: Benjamin Coddington References: <570E2D69.7080102@huawei.com> CC: , , Netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , , , From: Ding Tianhong Message-ID: <570EEAAD.2070907@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:56:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.22.246] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.570EEAB2.0160,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 7b69b77aa7ef3a73daeccac9043b8c65 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2229 Lines: 63 On 2016/4/13 22:11, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Ding Tianhong wrote: > >> Hi everyone: >> >> I have met this problem when I try to test udp6 for nfs connection, my environment is: >> >> Server: >> kernel: 4.1.15 >> IP:xxxx::36/64 >> MTU:1500 >> Setting: /etc/exports:/home/nfs *(rw,sync,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash) >> >> Client: >> kernel: 4.1.18 >> IP:xxxx::90/64 >> MTU:1500 >> command: mount -t nfs -o vers=3,proto=udp6,rsize=4096,wsize=4096 [xxxx::36]:/home/nfs /home/tmp >> >> I check the nfs parameter configuration, it looks fine and could work well for proto=tcp6. >> >> Then I have mount correctly and try to run the command "ls", it hang. >> >> When I use the rsize=1024 and wsize=1024 to mount, the problem disappeared, so I guess it is the problem for GSO or GRO for UDP。 >> >> Then I try to debug the problem, first I tcpdump the package from cline to server, and found that >> the client have send readdirplus message to server correctly, and then the Server send a 4k package >> to client(the big package will frag to 4 package by GSO), till now it looks fine, and the Client Nic could >> receive the 4 skb then send to upper stack to ipv6 and udp, I found the incoming 4 package has been merged >> to one and send to upper stack just like sunrpc, but I try to open the rpc_debug, it looks that the rpc could >> not receive message. >> >> >> I built a simple demo to test the udp stack, use the client socket to send big package to server socket, it work well, >> so I think the udp is fine, maybe the bug is in sunrpc. >> >> The test is very simple, does any body met the same problem like me, thanks for any suggestion. >> >> Ding > > I had a similar problem. Do you have upstream > > 405c92f ("ipv6: add defensive check for CHECKSUM_PARTIAL skbs in ip_fragment") > 682b1a9 ("ipv6: no CHECKSUM_PARTIAL on MSG_MORE corked sockets") > Hi Ben: Thanks for the feedback, my kernel is 4.1.15, not merged these two patch, I will check and try, thanks a lot. > Turning off GSO and GRO caused sunrpc to work properly before this. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271759 > Sorry, I don't have permission to read this, but thanks for this message.:) Ding > Ben >