Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:47:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, zab@redhat.com, emunson@akamai.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aarcange@redhat.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
        xemul@parallels.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, milosz@adfin.com,
        arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, gorcunov@openvz.org,
        iulia.manda21@gmail.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        mguzik@redhat.com, adobriyan@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, fw@deneb.enyo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask.
Message-ID: <20160413234703.615f3016@grimm.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20160413135950.GA12128@kroah.com>
References: <1460552272-15985-1-git-send-email-rjones@redhat.com>
	<20160413135950.GA12128@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 327
Lines: 13

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:59:50 -0700
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:


> Why not add this to the ktest infrastructure, we strongly encourage that
> for new syscalls, along with a man page patch.

Do you mean the "selftest infrastructure"? As I don't see how this
could be used with ktest.

See tools/testing/selftests/

-- Steve