Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754518AbcDNIrd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 04:47:33 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:40442 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754494AbcDNIrc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 04:47:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:47:28 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Yang Shi Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: make SCHED_MC and SCHED_SMT depend on SMP Message-ID: <20160414084727.GA23207@arm.com> References: <1460595252-2330-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1460595252-2330-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 317 Lines: 9 On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:54:12PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote: > SCHED_MC and SCHED_SMT are pointless when SMP is disabled. > Although SMP is rarely disabled for ARM64, it looks more consistent to have > such depend in Kconfig. You can't disable CONFIG_SMP for arm64 -- we select it unconditionally in the kconfig. Will