Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754772AbcDNLFt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 07:05:49 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:43360 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751737AbcDNLFp (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2016 07:05:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:05:39 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Kamil Debski , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, Joachim Eastwood , Thomas Petazzoni , Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Jingoo Han , Lee Jones , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Tomi Valkeinen , Robert Jarzmik , Alexandre Belloni , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hartley Sweeten , Ryan Mallon , Alexander Shiyan , Milo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/46] pwm: rcar: make use of pwm_is_enabled() Message-ID: <20160414130539.272166b0@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20160412110152.GG18882@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <1459368249-13241-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1459368249-13241-2-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20160412110152.GG18882@ulmo.ba.sec> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 34 Hi Thierry On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:01:52 +0200 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:03:24PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Commit 5c31252c4a86 ("pwm: Add the pwm_is_enabled() helper") introduced a > > new function to test whether a PWM device is enabled or not without > > manipulating PWM internal fields. > > Hiding this is necessary if we want to smoothly move to the atomic PWM > > config approach without impacting PWM drivers. > > Fix this driver to use pwm_is_enabled() instead of directly accessing the > > ->flags field. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > --- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Applied, thanks. I'd like to rebase my atomic series on top of pwm/for-next but I don't see the 4 patches you said you applied. Did you forget to push your local branch, or did you decide to revert them based on Lee's comments? Regards, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com