Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:32:26 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
Cc: Micha?? K??pie?? <kernel@kempniu.pl>, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fujitsu-laptop: Support radio LED
Message-ID: <20160415073226.GA16654@f23x64.localdomain>
References: <20160318120418.GA29889@marvin.atrad.com.au>
 <20160322133051.GA3379@eudyptula.hq.kempniu.pl>
 <20160324113513.GA5129@marvin.atrad.com.au>
 <20160410023020.GA27081@dvhart-mobl5.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20160410105258.GA2922@marvin.atrad.com.au>
 <20160412123634.GA8195@marvin.atrad.com.au>
 <20160415044255.GE3232@f23x64.localdomain>
 <20160415053333.GP12741@marvin.atrad.com.au>
 <20160415054417.GA127188@f23x64.localdomain>
 <20160415060015.GQ12741@marvin.atrad.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160415060015.GQ12741@marvin.atrad.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1398
Lines: 33

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:30:15PM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> Hi Darren
> 
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:44:52PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 03:03:33PM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > > > I've made a couple cosmetic changes and queued to for-next. Please review
> > > > and let me know if you have any concerns.
> > > 
> > > Sure.  Pardon my ignorance of such things, but what is the most
> > > straight-forward way to review the queued commit (preferrably without
> > > cloning an entire kernel git repo)?
> > 
> > You can see the tree in the MAINTAINERS file, but I suppose that doesn't
> > make it obvious how to browse it.  You can do that via the git web
> > interface on infradead.
> 
> Oh, there is a git-web interface on that server.  I should have just
> followed my instinct.  Apologies for the noise.
> 
> > The direct link to this patch is here:
> > 
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/34b5199d2b69f9be731233af2425c53cc7ff995b
> 
> The commit looks fine to me.  My only question is whether Michal should be
> credited explicitly as the author since the patch originated from him (I
> essentially just added some comments).  You know the process better than me
> though so I'll leave it up to you.

Indeed he should. Thank you for catching that. Corrected.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center