Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753377AbcDOISK (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:18:10 -0400 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:32358 "EHLO ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753299AbcDOISC (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:18:02 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2DBDwAOoxBXNbGFLHlegziBUIJyg3mfMQEBAQEBAQaMEYNPghmEDoRmgSICAgEBAoE9TQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBQkCEQQEBAQMBOhwjBQsIAxgJJQ8FJQMHGhOIIQfCNwEBAQcCAR0ZhUCFE4QphWwFmAyOBIFxh3eFM0WOZIMUgUcqMIgKgTwBAQE Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:17:57 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Waiman Long Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Christoph Lameter , Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch , Toshimitsu Kani Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called Message-ID: <20160415081757.GK10643@dastard> References: <1460484775-33359-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1460484775-33359-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <20160414031634.GJ10643@dastard> <570FC379.7000107@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <570FC379.7000107@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2422 Lines: 69 On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:21:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 04/13/2016 11:16 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:12:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > >>When performing direct I/O, the current ext4 code does > >>not pass in the DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag to dax_do_io() or > >>__blockdev_direct_IO() when inode_dio_begin() has, in fact, been > >>called. This causes dax_do_io()/__blockdev_direct_IO() to invoke > >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() internally. This doubling of > >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() calls are wasteful. > >> > >>This patch removes the extra internal inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() > >>calls when those calls are being issued by the caller directly. For > >>really fast storage systems like NVDIMM, the removal of the extra > >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() can give a meaningful boost to > >>I/O performance. > >Doesn't this break truncate IO serialisation? > > > >i.e. it appears to me that the ext4 use of inode_dio_begin()/ > >inode_dio_end() does not cover AIO, where the IO is still in flight > >when submission returns. i.e. the inode_dio_end() call > >needs to be in IO completion, not in the submitter context. The only > >reason it doesn't break right now is that the duplicate accounting > >in the DIO code is correct w.r.t. AIO. Hence bypassing the DIO > >accounting will cause AIO writes to race with truncate. > > > >Same AIO vs truncate problem occurs with the indirect read case you > >modified to skip the direct IO layer accounting. > > I don't quite understand how the duplicate accounting is correct wrt > AIO. Both the direct and indirect paths are something like: > > inode_dio_begin() > ... > inode_dio_begin() > ... > inode_dio_end() > ... > inode_dio_end() With AIO: inode_dio_begin() ... inode_dio_begin() ... inode_dio_end() dio_complete inode_dio_end() IOWs, the ext4 accounting is broken w.r.t. AIO, where IO submission does not wait for IO completion before returning. > What the patch does is to eliminate the innermost > inode_dio_begin/end pair. Yes, and with that change inode_dio_wait() no longer waits for AIO+DIO writes on ext4, hence breaking truncate IO barrier requirements of inode_dio_wait(). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com